Andaman
How their buildings read
2 poor
Outcomes still vary building by building. Check the building, not the brochure.
What we found
A Rumah Murah listing names Glory Bounty Sdn Bhd as the developer entity for Casa Residenza, described as Andaman Group, which means the contracting entity differs from the group brand.
The evidence
Post-handover response
NegativeA StarProperty review says there have been complaints about Andaman on its other GRR scheme properties, without naming which or giving detail.
2 more findings
A complaints board post describes a buyer who had bought GRR units at Casa Subang and reported that the rental start happened three months before the agreed date, and that the buyer found the GRR wording did not allow early renting.
A lowyat.net owners' thread on The Arc @ Cyberjaya records an owner saying their last GRR payment had stopped and that the explanation given was a lack of funds, with an owner-complaint trail describing the marketing company's response as unhelpful.
Regulatory and legal
A Malaysian law firm's guidance on Guaranteed Rental Return schemes notes that a GRR marketed by Andaman Property Management was the subject of buyer legal action from 2017, and that the marketing company ignored several letters of demand while some owners had received no rental since 2016.
Corporate continuity
Blog posts from 2007 allege that Andaman's principals previously ran Meda Inc Bhd into heavy debt and that the group shares management with Meda, but these are anonymous allegations with no court or regulatory finding cited.
2 more findings
A PropertyGenie listing for Signature Park gives the developer as Andaman Group Berhad with registration numbers 1181031M / 201601010102, while Casa Residenza listings name Glory Bounty Sdn Bhd as the developer entity under the Andaman Group name.
An anonymous complaints page says the Andaman group was renamed Aviscon Property Management Sdn Bhd, but this is an unverified user post with no registry filing behind it.