Saujana Triangle

In Damansara Perdana (PJU 8)

Also known as Saujana Triangle (a subsidiary of MK Land), Saujana Triangle (subsidiary of MK Land Holdings)

What we found

A Court of Appeal decision in Saujana Triangle v Armanee Terrace Joint Management Body (2025) partly allowed the developer's appeal and awarded nominal damages for obstruction of access to Block B by the JMB.

The evidence

Delivery

Negative
  • The developer's own account in the Court of Appeal case says the delay in Block B vacant possession (2016 instead of 2014) triggered liquidated ascertained damages claims exceeding RM100 million to Block B purchasers.

3 more findings
  • Flora Damansara Block F buyers complained to The Star in January 2007 about a 20-month late delivery of vacant possession, which the developer attributed to problems with its main contractor.

  • The developer agreed to pay Flora Damansara Block F buyers their liquidated damages in full as set out in the S&P agreements, per a representative quoted in the same report.

  • Vacant possession of Armanee Terrace Block B, first scheduled for December 2014, was delivered to Wings A, B and C only between May and August 2016, because utility works for Block B were not completed on time.

Defects and workmanship

Negative
  • A resident forum thread on Armanee Terrace 2 reports buyers waiting for vacant possession for years and an approximately eight-year delay, with the developer's staff offering a six-month defects period that buyers said conflicted with the 24-month statutory term.

Regulatory and legal

Negative
  • A winding-up petition against Saujana Triangle Sdn Bhd was filed at the Shah Alam High Court (case BA-28NCC-97-02/2017), with a petition date of 28 February 2017 and a hearing date of 19 July 2017; the outcome is not shown on the page.

2 more findings
  • An arbitration tribunal rejected Saujana Triangle's RM94.67 million claim against contractor Crest Builder Sdn Bhd (which included RM6.58 million of liquidated damages) and awarded Crest Builder RM18.36 million on its counterclaim, with costs of RM2.13 million ordered against Saujana.

  • The Court of Appeal stayed the effect of IRB notices of assessment against Saujana Triangle pending its challenge, according to The Edge's report of a stay order.

Corporate continuity

Negative
  • MK Land's own material-litigation announcement to Bursa says Saujana Triangle determined its contract with Crest Builder in 2011 over the contractor's failure to complete a development project.

One more finding
  • Saujana Triangle is described in company data as a property development and investment holding company, incorporated in 1995 and based in Petaling Jaya, and was still shown as operating in a January 2025 profile.

Their buildings